Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Thoughts on Living the Text

I am sure that I am no different to most people, coming with preconceived ideas about what is church. Prior to this course I’ve heard many people say we, ‘we should do church differently’, ‘we need to become relevant to people in our society, in their world’, 'to connect and think out of the square’, come up with ‘fresh expressions’ of church’. But no one has come up with anything remotely helpful like, ‘what’ and ‘how’, without throwing out the baby with the bath water!

When I was reading the course reader before it even started, I come across ‘Preaching’ throwing a hand grenade in the fruit bowl’ by Baker. He too says that ‘something has got to change’, its ‘time for a rethink’! That we need to ‘think creatively’ and ‘get out of the time warp’! Baker, suggests that if we want to think creatively about church then it might be worth dropping out…choirs, worship leaders etc. He then asks what about applying this to preaching and ‘dropping out sermons’! That was defiantly a hand grenade and had me asking questions. “What was it that I didn’t like in preaching and could do without, like boring irrelevant 3 point sermons, and what was it that I couldn’t change, sound biblical message with good exegetical work (my Methodist background perhaps?). I was left with many questions, and this is where Steve’s course came in, offering some practical ways of ‘doing’ preaching, presenting differently, without sacrificing those things I hold as important. Ways of drawing people into the text, so they form a deeper relationship with Christ which then effects their whole lives, (that is the whole point!), yet still maintaining reverence in the process.

I was impressed with the ‘Romeo & Juliet’ movie introductions that we engage differently visually, we process everything at different speeds to what we did 20 yrs ago. I had not thought of it like this before.
This got me thinking. Music too has changed, its not just listened to any more, its visual too. Youth today, hear, see, and feel the ‘vibes’ of music. Would they ‘get’ my way of listening and entering music? Probably not, for they ‘live’ their music. This is what I want to do with the text. Present it in such a way that people come alive. That they not only enter the text, but that they hear, see, taste, and feel the vibes of the text. That it is not ‘just’ a ‘story’ way over there, irrelevant to their lives, but rather a story that is connected and expresses their lives, their deep inner feelings, which offers hope.

A little dj-ing may be needed. The way we layer and mix effects the experience. Through dj-ing we can use everyday life experiences and lay them alongside a message or even mix through, yet keeping the integrity of the message. I was challenged by the dj stuff. I hadn't thought of doing this juxtaposed etc. as a sermon form, this was interesting.

Some things have changed the way I think of living the text. Although I have meditated on the Word before, I have never spent so much time hearing and re-hearing a text. The message of the bible is not just to be read, but heard, again and again. To be tasted……and felt……to be seen……..and held. To be read in community…..wow, I haven’t read the bible like that before. How enriching and illuminating! This opens up ways for people to become actively involved in the Word. Most people don't have time to go to a ‘bible study’ during the week where they can delve in the text at depth. But this way, people can listen, think, draw on their life experiences, ask questions of the text and talk with each other about the text. I liked this because it not only actively gets people involved, but it also deepens relationships.

I found the ‘Godly Play’ and ‘takeaways’ helpful. They showed the deep impact that ‘images’ can have, in words, and visuals, revelling the importance of using all our senses in worship and engaging with Scripture. This combined with the use of art and electronic visuals, and lighting (even in a simple form) I can see can add to the Scriptural experience. We all like to remember. Visual aids prompt this. They remind us to do something, to go back and think about what we felt or heard. The challenge is to introduce refreshing experiences using various expressions in which a community (for all are different) can effectively engage and enter worship with God and experience the life with His Word.

This course has certainly made me review ‘preaching’ and how I present worship. It has also made me stop and think about me, about what makes me, ‘me’. I am creative. I’m a musician, a quilter, who loves colours and fabrics. I love weaving ways of learning, layering, sight, sound, and activities so that a message integrates through these different parts building on the senses. I have just come to realise that I was ‘doing’ some of this outside of my church life. I have kept two quite separate boxes. Some of this is because of my church background. Growing up in the Methodist church. The question I’m asking myself now is, “am I going to step out and give it a go?” Integrating both areas of my life, using the tools in my toolbox, some of which I already had, but didn’t know it, and some of which I have gained from this course? The answer is, yes. It feels right, even natural and life giving to me. I have been thinking about what it would be like if I integrated my creativity with my spirituality. Just thinking about it at the moment gives me peace, and a feeling of being whole. Yes, I’m considering stepping out of the ‘box’, daring to do things differently (Wow, this is so unlike me, in a church environment!), with fear and trepidation! Yet excitement and a sense of freedom of expression too! An emerging journey! I look forward to what the future brings, and the challenge of change, starting within me. Change the way I think about and approach worship, allow my creativity to come into expression in church, bringing life and depth, to experience the text, I pray. Thanks Steve!

5 comments:

Don George said...

Hi Leanne. Thank you for your honest reflection. Like you I was challenged by the time one could spend in one text. This living the text both as an individual and in community means we can get so much more out of it. I have been leading a bible study in which during the week we all read a section of Matthew then together watch those same chapters on the visual bible1 together then share what impacted us. After that we look at particular verses which individuals felt were special to them. In doing so we drill deeper and deeper and God has touched each one of us in a special way as we hear from one another.
My role as the “expert” has not been to tell them just what the text means, rather it has been to fill in the background, explain the times in which it was written what made some things important to the Jews of the day etc. It has also been to release the imagination and at the same time help them to remain faithful to the text.
In the course reader there are lots of readings for preaching but the ideas can be used for far more than Sunday sermons. The same points can be used in bible studies, home groups and even evangelistic studies. McSpadden’s2 points, preach the basics, sermon as environment (in this case bible study), the multi-foliate self-disclosure, multiplicity of voices and getting the hearers to want to hear more from the bible.
1 Matthew, International Bible Society and Pathway Media.
2 McSpadden, The Art of Reading Scripture

mike stevens said...

Leanne, I can really sense the anticipation and eagerness in your reflection to bring the text to life in both your life and the lives whom you interact with. I am deeply encouraged by this, thankyou for your honest reflections! I really appreciated how you shared how dwelling in the word and the practice of Lectio Divina was useful in helping the Word come alive. This is something I have learnt over recent years and I really agree with you that as one ‘sits’ in the Word of God, being shaped by the stillness and meditative focus on the words, this creates a space for God to speak and break in. I do believe as we engage in these practices and also see the bible in the ‘colour’ Steve shared about, this will transform how the living text shapes and moulds us. Developing the use of imagination in reading and sharing the text is an important way to keep growing and engaging others in the text as well. I also agree with you that the Word can be read, but also felt, tasted, seen and held – this opens up so many possibilities as the Word comes to life. Keep exploring Leanne, Mike

Maria Ng said...

Thank you for sharing your excitement and wonder regarding personal change. Your reflection echoes Brian McLaren’s (2006) discussion about what he anticipates to be the radical future of the local church. Rather than get overwhelmed with the obvious changes we see around us in society and agonise over how we are meant to translate this into our congregations, he claims we need to embrace change and get into the flow of it, and don’t expect change to stop. If we aim to reach the next phase of growth or change in our churches and settle down in that new pattern, Brian claims that this just sets us up for getting outdated all over again. Our church structures, and the individuals in them, need to be flexible so that we can continually adapt. Brian terms this change a ‘revolution’. How do we get ready for that? A few suggestions Brian makes are applicable to the church community and to each of us as individuals. They are; don’t get distracted by needless bickering of others, get with like minded people, make room for messy creativity, increase our commitment to God (ie. don’t get side-tracked), be gracious to those who won’t agree nor understand, don’t be negative about modernity and outdated processes, be hopeful and keep on learning!

References:
McLaren, BD 2006, The Church on the Other Side - Exploring the Radical Future of the Local Congregation, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Anonymous said...

LesleyH here,

I agree with you Leanne, despite a heart yearning for church to be ‘different’ I too, have not come up with anything helpful without throwing out the proverbial baby with the proverbial bath water. Also like you, I have had my share of sermons, the good, the bad (crashingly so!) and the ugly and your comments about wanting to see people come alive as they enter the text; hearing, seeing, tasting and feeling the ‘vibes’ of the text really spoke to me. I am a ‘word’ person; words are my medium of thought, expression and even work. I am challenged to find ways in which I can include the seeing, tasting and feeling in my teaching.
I’ve been thinking a lot about what is increasingly being called ‘the emerging church’. While not yet attending – if indeed one does attend these things – an emerging church, I’m strongly drawn to the possibilities. Your comments about daring to be different resonate strongly. So many of us want to step outside of the box and experience the fear and trepidation of being in a place that seems to have no walls. Perhaps Rognilien’s ideas of creative collaboration may be a starting place for ‘giving it a go’? Working together with no ideas excluded could be the instigation of a whole new way of being church.
Blessings....

B Rognilien 2005, Experiential Worship, NavPress, Colorado Springs

Anonymous said...

Hiya Leanne,

I really appreciated reading your reflection, it's clear that this course has for you left much to ponder in the coming months.

I love your description of the Bible needing to be "tasted, felt and seen"... this imagery reintroduces the notion that the Bible is not stagnant nor to be confined in pragmatic methodological terms, but is a living, speaking text. Leonard Sweet, in his interview with Preaching Today, contends that we've led people to the altar point by point, reason by reason, law by law, and that's not how Jesus communicated (1). He goes on to suggest that our communication of the text needs to be more grounded in imagery and metaphor. I wonder if in our modernistic preaching we have so assaulted the text that it has not become something to be lived, breathed and felt but something to be confusing, oppressive, and obstructive.

I resonate with your concern that people study the text more deeply, and not just to "skim the surface". This is certainly the challenge in my life, to be able to delve into the richness of the text on a daily and personal basis. Indeed, postmodernity I believe has a huge task of dismantling the "expert handling" attitude toward Biblical exegesis and encourage all people to let the text speak to them as an individual, that they might come to know and love in even greater measure the God of which it speaks.

Blessings,

Josh

---
1. Leonard Sweet, The Metaphor Moment (Part One), National Pastors Convention. Accessed from http://nationalpastorsconvention.com/2002/resources/articles/metaphor1.htm